Any state may submit an informal written request to the executive director for assistance in interpreting the rules of this compact. The executive director may seek the assistance of legal counsel, the executive committee, or both, in interpreting the rules. The executive committee may authorize its standing committees to assist in interpreting the rules. Interpretations of the rules shall be issued in writing by the executive director or the executive committee and shall be circulated to all of the states. / Advisory Opinion Policy

Advisory Opinions by Year: 2008 - 2007 :: 2006 :: 2005 :: 2004 :: All Years At-A-Glance

2005

• Advisory Opinion 8-2005
  Can an Offender be considered not in substantial compliance because of an arrest in the receiving state during the investigation.
  11.21.05
• Advisory Opinion 7-2005
  Resident & Valid Plan of Supervision
  09.29.05
• HIPAA Clarification from HHS
  Guidance from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Civil Rights as to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) Coverage & Exemptions for the Interstate Compact for Adult Offender Supervision
  08.26.05
• Advisory Opinion 6-2005
  Request for Opinion as to Washington’s “deferred prosecution” statute
  06.13.05
• Advisory Opinion 5-2005
  Interpretation of Pre Parole Transfers requests in 3.105
  06.13.05
• Advisory Opinion 4-2005
  Offenders eligible to transfer supervision under Compact Rule 3.101 (c) & 3.101-2
  05.05.05
• Advisory Opinion 3-2005
  Applicability of the ICAOS, and its rules, requested by Circuit Judge John W. Debelius, III
  03.30.05
• Advisory Opinion 2-2005
  Arresting & Detaining Compact Probationers and Parolees.
  03.04.05
• Advisory Opinion 1-2005
  Including NCIC Criminal History with Compact Transfer Application
  FBI Opinion
  01.06.05